Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485566›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2024

Predicting urinary stone recurrence: a joint model analysis of repeated 24-hour urine collections from the MSTONE database.

Zifang Kong, Brett A Johnson, Naim M Maalouf, Stephen Y Nakada, Chad R Tracy, Ryan L Steinberg, Nicole Miller, Jodi A Antonelli, Yair Lotan, Margaret S Pearle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zifang KongDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA.
Brett A JohnsonDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Naim M MaaloufDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Stephen Y NakadaDepartment of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Chad R TracyDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ryan L SteinbergDepartment of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Nicole MillerDepartment of Urology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jodi A AntonelliDepartment of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Margaret S PearleDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Yu-Lun LiuPeter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Yulun.Liu@UTSouthwestern.edu.

Funding

Novel evidence-accumulation-driven methods for characterizing kidney stone progressionR01DK128237 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIU, YU-LUN · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128237NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK128237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the limitations in existing urinary stone recurrence (USR) models, including failure to account for changes in 24-hour urine (24U) parameters over time and ignoring multiplicity of stone recurrences, we presented a novel statistical method to jointly model temporal trends in 24U parameters and multiple recurrent stone events. The MSTONE database spanning May 2001 to April 2015 was analyzed. A joint recurrent model was employed, combining a linear mixed-effects model for longitudinal 24U parameters and a recurrent event model with a dynamic first-order Autoregressive (AR(1)) structure. A mixture cure component was included to handle patient heterogeneity. Comparisons were made with existing methods, multivariable Cox regression and conditional Prentice-Williams-Peterson regression, both applied to established nomograms. Among 396 patients (median follow-up of 2.93 years; IQR, 1.53-4.36 years), 34.6% remained free of stone recurrence throughout the study period, 30.0% experienced a single recurrence, and 35.4% had multiple recurrences. The joint recurrent model with a mixture cure component identified significant associations between 24U parameters - including urine pH (adjusted HR = 1.991; 95% CI 1.490-2.660; p < 0.001), total volume (adjusted HR = 0.700; 95% CI 0.501-0.977; p = 0.036), potassium (adjusted HR = 0.983; 95% CI 0.974-0.991; p < 0.001), uric acid (adjusted HR = 1.528; 95% CI 1.105-2.113, p = 0.010), calcium (adjusted HR = 1.164; 95% CI 1.052-1.289; p = 0.003), and citrate (adjusted HR = 0.796; 95% CI 0.706-0.897; p < 0.001), and USR, achieving better predictive performance compared to existing methods. 24U parameters play an important role in prevention of USR, and therefore, patients with a history of stones are recommended to closely monitor for future recurrence by regularly conducting 24U tests.

Indexed as

RecurrenceUrinary CalculiAdultAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsUric AcidUrinalysisUrineUrine Specimen CollectionUric Acid24-hour urine parametersJoint recurrent modelMixture cure modelUrinary stone recurrence

Identifiers

PMID39485566
PMCPMC11530469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.