Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485560›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2024

Exploring blood-brain barrier passage using atomic weighted vector and machine learning.

Yoan Martínez-López, Paulina Phoobane, Yanaima Jauriga, Juan A Castillo-Garit, Ansel Y Rodríguez-Gonzalez, Oscar Martínez-Santiago, Stephen J Barigye, Julio Madera, Noel Enrique Rodríguez-Maya, Pablo Duchowicz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yoan Martínez-LópezDepartment of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Informatics, Camagüey University, 74650, Camagüey City, Cuba. ymlopez2022@gmail.com.
Paulina PhoobaneWalter Sisulu University, Mthatha, Eastern Cape, Republic of South Africa.
Yanaima JaurigaDepartment of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Informatics, Camagüey University, 74650, Camagüey City, Cuba.
Juan A Castillo-GaritInstituto Universitario de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico (IDT), Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Ignacio Valdivieso 2409, San Joaquín, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Ansel Y Rodríguez-GonzalezUnidad de Transferencia Tecnológica de Tepic, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.
Oscar Martínez-SantiagoAlfa Vitamins Laboratories, Miami, FL, 33166, USA.
Stephen J BarigyeDepartamento de Química Física Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Julio MaderaDepartment of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Informatics, Camagüey University, 74650, Camagüey City, Cuba.
Noel Enrique Rodríguez-MayaDivisión de Estudios de Posgrado E Investigación, Instituto Tecnológico de Zitácuaro, Zitácuaro, Michoacán, Mexico.
Pablo DuchowiczInstituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquímicas Teóricas y Aplicadas (INIFTA), La Plata, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThis study investigates the potential of leveraging molecular properties, as determined by MD-LOVIs software and machine learning techniques, to predict the ability of compounds to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Accurate prediction of BBB permeation is critical for the development of central nervous system (CNS) drugs. The study applies various machine learning models, including both classification and regression techniques, to predict BBB passage and molecular activity. Notably, classification models such as GBM-AWV (accuracy = 0.801), GLM-CN (accuracy = 0.808), SVMPoly-means (accuracy = 0.980), SVMPoly-AC (accuracy = 0.980), SVMPoly-MI_TI_SI (accuracy = 0.900), SVMPoly-GI (accuracy = 0.900), RF-means (accuracy = 0.870), and GLM-means (accuracy = 0.818) demonstrate high accuracy in predicting BBB passage. In contrast, regression models like ES-RLM-AG (R

methodsThe computational methods employed in this study include the MD-LOVIs software for generating molecular descriptors and several machine learning algorithms, including gradient boosting machines (GBM), generalized linear models (GLM), support vector machines (SVM) with polynomial kernels, random forests (RF), ensemble regression models, and instance-based learning algorithms. These models were trained and validated using various datasets to predict BBB passage and molecular activity, with the performance metrics reported for each model. Standard computational techniques were employed throughout, ensuring the reliability of the predictions.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierMachine LearningHumansSoftwareSupport Vector MachineAtomic weighted vectorsBlood–brain barrierMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.