ReviewPlant molecular biology2024
Exploring the complexity of genome size reduction in angiosperms.
Review in Plant molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variable but Inheritable: Colchicine-Induced Polyploidy inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Nigella damascena genome provides insights into transposable element-driven genomic gigantism and trait evolution.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Phylogenetic Characterization of the FTIP Gene Family in Maize (Genes · 2025Article
- Bridging micro and macroevolution: insights from chromosomal dynamics in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genome sizes of angiosperms decreased significantly more than the genome sizes of their ancestors (pteridophytes and gymnosperms). Decreases in genome size involve a highly complex process, with remnants of the genome size reduction scattered across the genome and not directly linked to specific genomic structures. This is because the associated mechanisms operate on a much smaller scale than the mechanisms mediating increases in genome size. This review thoroughly summarizes the available literature regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying genome size reductions and introduces Utricularia gibba and Arabidopsis thaliana as model species for the examination of the effects of these molecular mechanisms. Additionally, we propose that phosphorus deficiency and drought stress are the major external factors contributing to decreases in genome size. Considering these factors affect almost all land plants, angiosperms likely gained the mechanisms for genome size reductions. These environmental factors may affect the retention rates of deletions, while also influencing the mutation rates of deletions via the functional diversification of the proteins facilitating double-strand break repair. The biased retention and mutation rates of deletions may have synergistic effects that enhance deletions in intergenic regions, introns, transposable elements, duplicates, and repeats, leading to a rapid decrease in genome size. We suggest that these selection pressures and associated molecular mechanisms may drive key changes in angiosperms during recurrent cycles of genome size decreases and increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.