Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485504›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology2024

Exploring the complexity of genome size reduction in angiosperms.

Akihiro Ezoe, Motoaki Seki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akihiro EzoePlant Genomic Network Research Team, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan. akihiro.ezoe@riken.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5515-343X
Motoaki SekiPlant Genomic Network Research Team, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan. motoaki.seki@riken.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8288-0467

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists 23K13932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome sizes of angiosperms decreased significantly more than the genome sizes of their ancestors (pteridophytes and gymnosperms). Decreases in genome size involve a highly complex process, with remnants of the genome size reduction scattered across the genome and not directly linked to specific genomic structures. This is because the associated mechanisms operate on a much smaller scale than the mechanisms mediating increases in genome size. This review thoroughly summarizes the available literature regarding the molecular mechanisms underlying genome size reductions and introduces Utricularia gibba and Arabidopsis thaliana as model species for the examination of the effects of these molecular mechanisms. Additionally, we propose that phosphorus deficiency and drought stress are the major external factors contributing to decreases in genome size. Considering these factors affect almost all land plants, angiosperms likely gained the mechanisms for genome size reductions. These environmental factors may affect the retention rates of deletions, while also influencing the mutation rates of deletions via the functional diversification of the proteins facilitating double-strand break repair. The biased retention and mutation rates of deletions may have synergistic effects that enhance deletions in intergenic regions, introns, transposable elements, duplicates, and repeats, leading to a rapid decrease in genome size. We suggest that these selection pressures and associated molecular mechanisms may drive key changes in angiosperms during recurrent cycles of genome size decreases and increases.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenome SizeMagnoliopsidaArabidopsisEvolution, MolecularAbiotic stressC-valueDarwin’s abominable mysteryGenome shrinkageGenome size reductionPhosphorus and nitrogen shortagePolyploid

Identifiers

PMID39485504
PMCPMC11530473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.