Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39485309›Full record

ArticleMutagenesis2025

Resolution of historically discordant Ames test negative/rodent carcinogenicity positive N-nitrosamines using a sensitive, OECD-aligned design.

Dean N Thomas, John W Wills, Mark Burman, Abbie N Williams, Danielle S G Harte, Ruby A Buckley, Mike W Urquhart, Anne-Sophie Bretonnet, Benjamin Jeffries, Angela T White and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mutagenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Dean N ThomasGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
John W WillsGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Mark BurmanGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Abbie N WilliamsGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Danielle S G HarteGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Ruby A BuckleyGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Mike W UrquhartGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Anne-Sophie BretonnetGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Benjamin JeffriesGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Angela T WhiteGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
James S HarveyGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Jonathan R HoweGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.
Anthony M LynchGSK Research and Development, Genetic Toxicology and Photosafety, Stevenage, SG1 2NY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1533-7664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) test is crucial for evaluating the mutagenicity of pharmaceutical impurities. For N-nitrosamines (NAs) historical data indicated that for certain members of this chemical class, the outcomes of the Ames test did not correlate with their associated rodent carcinogenicity outcomes. This has resulted in negative outcomes in an OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development)-aligned Ames test alone (standard or enhanced) no longer being considered sufficient by regulatory authorities to assess potential carcinogenic risk of NAs if present as impurities in drug products. Consequently, extensive follow-up in vivo testing can be required to characterize the potential mutagenicity and genotoxic carcinogenicity of NA impurities (i.e. beyond that defined in the ICH M7 guideline for non-NA impurities). We previously demonstrated that the mutagenicity of alkyl-nitrosamines can be detected by the appropriately designed, OECD-aligned Ames test and identified those conditions that contributed most to assay sensitivity. This OECD-aligned Ames test design was used to assess seven NAs, i.e. (methyl(neopentyl)nitrosamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-2-propanamine, N-nitrosodiisopropylamine, bis(2-methoxyethyl)nitrosoamine, N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-fluoroaniline, dinitrosoethambutol, (R,R)- and mononitrosocaffeidine) that were reported to be negative in historical Ames tests but positive in rodent carcinogenicity studies. All seven of the NAs were demonstrated to be mutagenic in the OECD-aligned Ames test and therefore these compounds should no longer be considered as discordant (false negatives) with respect to the correlation of the Ames test and rodent carcinogenicity. These results confirm the sensitivity of the OECD-aligned Ames test for the detection of NA mutagenicity and provides further support of its pivotal placement within the ICH M7 framework for the assessment of mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk. In addition, we present data for 1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine, that indicates it could serve as a suitable positive control to provide further confidence in the sensitivity of the Ames test for the NA chemical class.

Indexed as

CarcinogensMutagensNitrosaminesAnimalsCarcinogenicity TestsMutagenicity TestsOrganisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentSalmonella typhimuriumCarcinogensMutagensNitrosaminesBacterial reverse mutation testN-nitrosamineRegulatory testing

Identifiers

PMID39485309
PMCPMC12022218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.