ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
Pain-Discriminating Information Decoded From Spatiotemporal Patterns of Hemodynamic Responses Measured by fMRI in the Human Brain.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been widely used in studying the neural mechanisms of pain in the human brain, primarily focusing on where in the brain pain-elicited neural activities occur (i.e., the spatial distribution of pain-related brain activities). However, the temporal dynamics of pain-elicited hemodynamic responses (HDRs) measured by fMRI may also contain information specific to pain processing but have been largely neglected. Using high temporal resolution fMRI (TR = 0.8 s) data acquired from 62 healthy participants, in the present study we aimed to test whether pain-distinguishing information could be decoded from the spatial pattern of the temporal dynamics (i.e., the spatiotemporal pattern) of HDRs elicited by painful stimuli. Specifically, the peak latency and the response duration were used to characterize the temporal dynamics of HDRs to painful laser stimuli and non-painful electric stimuli, and then were compared between the two conditions (i.e., pain and no-pain) using a voxel-wise univariate analysis and a multivariate pattern analysis. Furthermore, we also tested whether the two temporal characteristics of pain-elicited HDRs and their spatial patterns were associated with pain-related behaviors. We found that the spatial patterns of HDR peak latency and response duration could successfully discriminate pain from no-pain. Interestingly, we also observed that the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ) scores were correlated with the average response duration in bilateral insula and secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) and could also be predicted from the across-voxel spatial patterns of response durations in the middle cingulate cortex and middle frontal gyrus only during painful condition but not during non-painful condition. These findings indicate that the spatiotemporal pattern of pain-elicited HDRs may contain pain-specific information and highlight the importance of studying the neural mechanisms of pain by taking advantage of the high sensitivity of fMRI to both spatial and temporal information of brain responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.