Observational studyOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025
The unmet need for certification of vision impairment for people accessing a national primary care-based low vision rehabilitation service.
Observational study in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Support for Older People With Vision Impairment: A Rapid Realist Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- The unmet need for certification of vision impairment for people accessing a national primary care-based low vision rehabilitation service.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe certificate of vision impairment has an important role in enabling access to support for people with vision impairment (VI) and the provision of epidemiological data regarding sight loss. However, the rates of certification may not accurately reflect the number of people living with certifiable VI.
methodsObservational data from a national primary care low vision rehabilitation service between 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2022 were analysed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the certification status of patients with certifiable VI. For patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and best-corrected visual acuity of 6/60 or worse, logistic regression was undertaken to assess the effects of patient characteristics on certification status.
resultsFor patients with AMD and certifiable levels of visual acuity, 41.00% (n = 426) were not certified. The reported certification was 60.09% (n = 256) and 58.24% (n = 357) for neovascular AMD and atrophic AMD, respectively. Existing patients of the service were 3.87 times more likely to be certified than new patients (OR 3.87, 95% CI 2.7-5.4). Increasing age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.004-1.038) and decreasing visual acuity (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.78) were associated with an increased likelihood of certification.
conclusionA significant number of patients live with certifiable vision impairment but do not access certification. Policy changes in Wales now enable patients with bilateral atrophic AMD to access certification within the primary care setting. Given the unmet need, consideration should be given to primary care certification in the rest of the UK, and in Wales, the potential to expand the scope of conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.