ReviewThe FEBS journal2025
A one-day journey to the suburbs: circadian clock in the Drosophila visual system.
Review in The FEBS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Variation in Drosophila melanogaster Clock PolyQ Length: Geographic Gradients and Functional Properties.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Living organisms, which are constantly exposed to cyclical variations in their environment, need a high degree of plasticity in their visual system to respond to daily and seasonal fluctuations in lighting conditions. In Drosophila melanogaster, the visual system is a complex tissue comprising different photoreception structures that exhibit daily rhythms in gene expression, cell morphology, and synaptic plasticity, regulated by both the central and peripheral clocks. In this review, we briefly summarize the structure of the circadian clock and the visual system in Drosophila and comprehensively describe circadian oscillations in visual structures, from molecules to behaviors, which are fundamental for the fine-tuning of visual sensitivity. We also compare some features of the rhythmicity in the visual system with that of the central pacemaker and hypothesize about the differences in the regulatory signals and mechanisms that control these two clocks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.