ArticleActa odontologica latinoamericana : AOL2024
Microtomographic and histological evaluation of two bioceramics as pulp capping agents in vivo.
Article in Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maintaining pulp vitality and function is a priority of the medicaments employed in pulp therapy to preserve tooth integrity. Aim: This study evaluated inflammatory response and reparative dentin bridge formation after direct pulp capping with two different bioceramics. Materials and Method: This was an in vivo controlled experimental study on 12 male Wistar rats. Pulpotomies were performed and the exposed pulps were capped with Biodentine or Neo MTA. After 15, 45 and 90 days, maxillary segments were obtained and prepared for histologic analysis and Micro-CT. Hounsfield Units (HU) were quantified. Results: Micro-CT analysis showed greater mineralization at 90 days with Neo MTA than with Biodentine. HU did not differ significantly (p >0.05) between molars treated with Biodentine and Neo MTA at 15 and 45 days, but at 90 days, there was statistically significant difference (p <0.05) between them. Reparative dentin was observed near the pulp exposure and canal orifice with both bioceramics. At 45 and 90 days, molars treated with Neo MTA showed mineralized tissue filling the canal orifice. Molars treated with Biodentine showed mineralized tissue and dentin bridge at the site of exposure at 45 days, and total pulp exposure coverage and mineralized entin matrix at 90 days. Conclusions: Biodentine and Neo MTA induce the formation of reparative dentin bridge after 45 days with inflammatory cell infiltrate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.