Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39484709›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2024

Influencing factors, evolution, and strategies for improving the quality of traditional Chinese medicine patents: an empirical study based on patent invalidation cases.

Xin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xin LiShanghai International College of Intellectual Property, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analyzes 134 invalidated traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) patents from 1984 to 2021 to explore common weaknesses and track quality progression. The findings highlight that TCM patents applied for between 2001 and 2005 face higher invalidation rates, with disputes often arising 4-7 years post-application. Disputes are concentrated in patents related to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, exacerbated by widespread geographical distribution and technology saturation. Combination patents are more prone to invalidation than single-component ones, and patents using preparation methods to describe products carry hidden risks. Additionally, citing more references positively impacts patent stability. Despite progress, TCM patents still encounter significant challenges in quality and consistency.

Indexed as

Medicine, Chinese TraditionalPatents as TopicHumansinnovation in TCMpatent examination standardspatent invalidationpatent qualityTraditional Chinese medicine (TCM)

Identifiers

PMID39484709
PMCPMC11536629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.