ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Improved protein interaction models predict differences in complexes between human cell lines.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interactions of proteins to form complexes play a crucial role in cell function. Data on protein-protein or pairwise interactions (PPI) typically come from a combination of sample separation and mass spectrometry. Since 2010, several extensive, high-throughput mass spectrometry-based experimental studies have dramatically expanded public repositories for PPI data and, by extension, our knowledge of protein complexes. Unfortunately, challenges of limited overlap between experiments, modality-oriented biases, and prohibitive costs of experimental reproducibility continue to limit coverage of the human protein assembly map, both underscoring the need for and spurring the development of relevant computational approaches. Here, we present a new method for predicting the strength of protein interactions. It addresses two important issues that have limited past PPI prediction approaches: incomplete feature sets and incomplete proteome coverage. For a given collection of protein pairs, we fused data from heterogeneous sources into a feature matrix and identified the minimal set of feature partitions for which a non-empty set of protein pairs had complete values. For each such feature partition, we trained a classifier to predict PPI probabilities. We then calculated an overall prediction for a given protein pair by weighting the probabilities from all models that applied to that pair. Our approach accurately identified known and highly probable PPI, far exceeding the performance of current approaches and providing more complete proteome coverage. We then used the predicted probabilities to assemble complexes using previously-described graph-based tools and clustering algorithms and again obtained improved results. Lastly, we used features for three human cell lines to predict PPI and complex scores and identified complexes predicted to differ between those cell lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.