Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39484534›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Improved protein interaction models predict differences in complexes between human cell lines.

Gary R Wilkins, Jose Lugo-Martinez, Robert F Murphy

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gary R WilkinsRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
Jose Lugo-MartinezRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.ORCID 0000-0002-6312-1577
Robert F MurphyRay and Stephanie Lane Computational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.ORCID 0000-0003-0358-901X

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interactions of proteins to form complexes play a crucial role in cell function. Data on protein-protein or pairwise interactions (PPI) typically come from a combination of sample separation and mass spectrometry. Since 2010, several extensive, high-throughput mass spectrometry-based experimental studies have dramatically expanded public repositories for PPI data and, by extension, our knowledge of protein complexes. Unfortunately, challenges of limited overlap between experiments, modality-oriented biases, and prohibitive costs of experimental reproducibility continue to limit coverage of the human protein assembly map, both underscoring the need for and spurring the development of relevant computational approaches. Here, we present a new method for predicting the strength of protein interactions. It addresses two important issues that have limited past PPI prediction approaches: incomplete feature sets and incomplete proteome coverage. For a given collection of protein pairs, we fused data from heterogeneous sources into a feature matrix and identified the minimal set of feature partitions for which a non-empty set of protein pairs had complete values. For each such feature partition, we trained a classifier to predict PPI probabilities. We then calculated an overall prediction for a given protein pair by weighting the probabilities from all models that applied to that pair. Our approach accurately identified known and highly probable PPI, far exceeding the performance of current approaches and providing more complete proteome coverage. We then used the predicted probabilities to assemble complexes using previously-described graph-based tools and clustering algorithms and again obtained improved results. Lastly, we used features for three human cell lines to predict PPI and complex scores and identified complexes predicted to differ between those cell lines.

Indexed as

cell specificityensemble learningprotein co-expressionprotein complexesprotein localizationprotein-protein interactions

Identifiers

PMID39484534
PMCPMC11527118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.