ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Functional organization and natural scene responses across mouse visual cortical areas revealed with encoding manifolds.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A challenge in sensory neuroscience is understanding how populations of neurons operate in concert to represent diverse stimuli. To meet this challenge, we have created "encoding manifolds" that reveal the overall responses of brain areas to diverse stimuli with the resolution of individual neurons and their response dynamics. Here we use encoding manifold to compare the population-level encoding of primary visual cortex (VISp) with five higher visual areas (VISam, VISal, VISpm, VISlm, and VISrl). We used data from the Allen Institute Visual Coding-Neuropixels dataset from the mouse. We show that the encoding manifold topology computed only from responses to grating stimuli is continuous, for V1 and for higher visual areas, with smooth coordinates spanning it that include orientation selectivity and firing-rate magnitude. Surprisingly, the manifolds for each visual area revealed novel relationships between how natural scenes are encoded relative to static gratings-a relationship that was conserved across visual areas. Namely, neurons preferring natural scenes preferred either low or high spatial frequency gratings, but not intermediate ones. Analyzing responses by cortical layer reveals a preference for gratings concentrated in layer 6, whereas preferences for natural scenes tended to be higher in layers 2/3 and 4. The results reveal how machine learning approaches can be used to organize and visualize the structure of sensory coding, thereby revealing novel relationships within and across brain areas and sensory stimuli.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.