ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
OPTICAL BLUR AFFECTS DIFFERENTLY ON AND OFF VISUAL PATHWAYS.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The human eye has a crystalline lens that focuses retinal images at the point of fixation. Outside this fixation region, images are distorted by optical blur, which increases light scatter and reduces the spatial resolution and contrast processed by neuronal pathways. The spectacle lenses that humans use for optical correction also minify or magnify the images, affecting neuronal surround suppression in visual processing. Because light and dark stimuli are processed with ON and OFF pathways that have different spatial resolution, contrast sensitivity and surround suppression, optical blur and image magnification should affect differently the two pathways and the perception of lights and darks. Our results provide support for this prediction in cats and humans. We demonstrate that optical blur expands ON receptive fields while shrinking OFF receptive fields, as expected from the expansion of light stimuli and shrinkage of dark stimuli with light scatter. Spectacle-induced image magnification also shrinks OFF more than ON receptive fields, as expected from the stronger surround suppression in OFF than ON pathways. Optical blur also decreases the population response of OFF more than ON pathways, consistent with the different effects of light scatter on dark and light stimuli and the ON-OFF pathway differences in contrast sensitivity. Based on these results, we conclude that optical blur and image magnification reduce the receptive field sizes and cortical responses of OFF more than ON pathways, making the ON-OFF response balance a reliable signal to optimize the size and quality of the retinal image.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.