ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
AI-readiness Criteria for Biomedical Data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Development of AI competencies within the medical curriculum.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Data, Process, and Data-Driven Representations of Digital Twins in Diabetes: Scoping Review.JMIR diabetes · 2026Review
- Explosion of formulaic research articles, including inappropriate study designs and false discoveries, based on the NHANES US national health database.PLoS biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomedical research is rapidly adopting artificial intelligence (AI). Yet the inherent complexity of biomedical data preparation requires implementing actionable, robust criteria for ethical and explainable AI (XAI) at the "pre-model" stage, encompassing data acquisition, detailed transformations, and ethical governance. Simple conformance to FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) Principles is insufficient. Here, we define criteria and practices for reliable AI-readiness of biomedical data, developed by the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.