ArticleNeuroSci2024
Wearable EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Stress Monitoring.
Article in NeuroSci, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Filter Bank to Improve Fatigue Monitoring in Wearable EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interface.NeuroSci · 2026Article
- An Arduino-Based, Portable Prototype for the Recording and Analysis of EEG Signals to Support Self-Detection and Self-Monitoring of Stress.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- EEG-based stress classification using time-domain features and segmentation techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Brain-inspired signal processing for detecting stress during mental arithmetic tasks.Brain informatics · 2025Article
- A multi-modal deep learning approach for stress detection using physiological signals: integrating time and frequency domain features.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting stress is important for improving human health and potential, because moderate levels of stress may motivate people towards better performance at cognitive tasks, while chronic stress exposure causes impaired performance and health risks. We propose a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) system to detect stress in the context of high-pressure work environments. The BCI system includes an electroencephalogram (EEG) headband with dry electrodes and an electrocardiogram (ECG) chest belt. We collected EEG and ECG data from 40 participants during two stressful cognitive tasks: the Cognitive Vigilance Task (CVT), and the Multi-Modal Integration Task (MMIT) we designed. We also recorded self-reported stress levels using the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ). The DSSQ results indicated that performing the MMIT led to significant increases in stress, while performing the CVT did not. Subsequently, we trained two different models to classify stress from non-stress states, one using EEG features, and the other using heart rate variability (HRV) features extracted from the ECG. Our EEG-based model achieved an overall accuracy of 81.0% for MMIT and 77.2% for CVT. However, our HRV-based model only achieved 62.1% accuracy for CVT and 56.0% for MMIT. We conclude that EEG is an effective predictor of stress in the context of stressful cognitive tasks. Our proposed BCI system shows promise in evaluating mental stress in high-pressure work environments, particularly when utilizing an EEG-based BCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.