ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2024
A computed tomography‑based radio‑clinical model for the prediction of microvascular invasion in gastric cancer.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to build and validate a radio-clinical model integrating radiological features and clinical characteristics based on information available before surgery for prediction of microvascular invasion (MI) in gastric cancer. The retrospective study included a cohort of 534 patients (n=374 for the training set and n=160 for the test set) who were diagnosed with gastric cancer. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography within one month before surgery. The focal area was mapped by ITK-SNAP. Radiomics features were extracted from portal venous phase CT images. Principal component analysis was used to reduce dimensionality, maximum relevance minimum redundancy, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator to screen features most associated with MI. The radiomics signature was subsequently computed based on the coefficient weight assigned to it. The independent risk factors for MI of gastric cancer were determined using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between clinical characteristics and MI status. A radio-clinical model was constructed by employing multi-variable logistic regression analysis, incorporating radiomic features with clinical characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves were employed for the analysis and evaluation of the model's performance. The radiomics signature model had moderate recognition ability, with an area under ROC curve (AUC) of 0.77 for the training set and 0.73 for the test set. The radio-clinical model, consisting of rad-score and clinical features, could well discriminate the training set and test set (AUC=0.88 and 0.80, respectively). The calibration curves and DCA further validated the favorable fit and clinical applicability of the radio-clinical model. In conclusion, the radio-clinical model combining the radiomics signature and clinical characteristics may be used to individually predict MI in gastric cancer to aid in the development of a clinical treatment strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.