ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
Accelerated Epigenetic Aging is Associated with Faster Glaucoma Progression: A DNA Methylation Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cautions on utilizing plasma GFAP level as a biomarker for reactive astrocytes in neurodegenerative diseases.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the association between epigenetic age acceleration and glaucoma progression. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: 100 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients with fast progression and 100 POAG patients with slow progression. Methods: Subjects were classified as fast or slow progressors based on rates of change in standard automated perimetry (SAP) mean deviation (MD) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Epigenetic age was calculated using the Horvath, Hannum, PhenoAge, and GrimAge clocks from DNA methylation profiles obtained from blood samples. Age acceleration (AgeAccel) was defined as the residual from a linear regression of epigenetic age on chronologic age, with positive values suggesting faster biological aging. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the association between AgeAccel and likelihood of fast progression, adjusting for confounders. Main Outcome Measures: Difference in epigenetic age acceleration between fast and slow glaucoma progressors. Results: The mean rate of SAP MD change in the fastest progressing eye was -1.06 dB/year (95% CI: -1.28 to -0.85) for fast progressors compared to -0.10 dB/year (95% CI: -0.16 to -0.04) for slow progressors (P<0.001). For RNFL thickness, corresponding values were -1.60 μm/year (95% CI: -1.97 to -1.23) and -0.76 μm/year (95% CI: -1.04 to -0.48), respectively (P<0.001). Fast progressors demonstrated significantly greater age acceleration compared to slow progressors for the Horvath clock (mean difference = 2.93 years, 95% CI: 1.48 to 4.39, P<0.001) and Hannum clock (mean difference = 1.24 years, 95% CI: 0.03 to 2.46, P=0.045). In multivariable models, each year of Horvath AgeAccel was associated with 15% higher odds of fast progression (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.23, P<0.001), after adjusting for sex, race, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, baseline disease severity, smoking status and follow-up time. Hannum and GrimAge clocks also showed significant associations with fast progression. The association between AgeAccel and fast progression was stronger in subjects with relatively low IOP during follow-up. Conclusion: Accelerated epigenetic aging was associated with faster glaucoma progression. These findings suggest that faster biological age, as reflected in DNA methylation, may increase optic nerve susceptibility to damage, highlighting epigenetic age as a potential prognostic biomarker.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.