Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39484229›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2024

How do Patients and Managers Value Gold Standard Elements in Primary Health Care.

G Gálvez, M L Jimenez, R Manzanera, A Ávalos, M De Castro, I Moral, A Iruela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G GálvezPatient Evaluation and Experience Unit. Catalan Health Service, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7980-1297
M L JimenezDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of the Philippines, College of Medicine, Manila, Philippines.
R ManzaneraEnginyeria Biomédica, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
A ÁvalosFaculty of Economics and Business, Department of Sociology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
M De CastroUser service office, Health Care Institute, Girona, Spain.
I MoralEAP Sardenya, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-8796
A IruelaFaculty of Medicine UVIC-UCC, Vic, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study explores how Primary Health Care Team managers in Catalonia assess the gold standard criteria for excellence in Primary Health Care and whether there are differences in evaluations between the best and worst-rated centers by patients in a patient experience survey included in the Catalan Satisfaction Survey Plan (PLAENSA). The researchers used mixed methods to analyze 12 interviews done to Primary Care Team (PCT) managers. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed, yielding three themes and 12 subthemes. A Likert-type questionnaire was also used to compare results. Scores were observed between 4.8 and 3.5 regarding a constant relationship with the patient (longitudinality), and patient's experience, respectively. All managers highlight accessibility, nursing management, and administrative support as essential to patient experience. No significant differences exist in PCT's scores or gold standard element application. Disposing of good accessibility, crucial in Primary Health Care management, an administrative team, and efficiently prepared and motivated professionals, are key elements to a patient's experience in Primary Health Care. Contrary to other studies, interviewees described better accessibility in rural centers, which is likely why they are better valued by patients.

Indexed as

healthcare services qualitypatient experiencepatient satisfactionpatient’s perception of carePLAENSAPrimary Health Care managementrural centers

Identifiers

PMID39484229
PMCPMC11526219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.