Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39484216›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Development of a welfare assessment tool for tourist camp elephants in Asia.

Raman Ghimire, Janine L Brown, Chatchote Thitaram, Sharon S Glaeser, Kannika Na-Lampang, Pawinee Kulnanan, Pakkanut Bansiddhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. PsittaWel: A welfare assessment tool for companion parrots.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raman GhimireFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Janine L BrownCenter of Elephant and Wildlife Health, Chiang Mai University Animal Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3898-7755
Chatchote ThitaramFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9319-5596
Sharon S GlaeserOregon Zoo, Portland, Oregon, United States.
Kannika Na-LampangFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pawinee KulnananCenter of Elephant and Wildlife Health, Chiang Mai University Animal Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9591-067X
Pakkanut BansiddhiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Approximately one-third of Asian elephants are managed under human care, participating in educational, cultural, religious, and tourist activities. Management conditions vary considerably among venues, raising questions about whether welfare needs are consistently being met, particularly for Asian tourist camp elephants. To evaluate the well-being of elephants engaged in tourist activities, an evidence-based tool is needed for routine assessments to identify potential welfare risks, aid in the development of better camp standards, and enable caretakers to address specific concerns. While many animal welfare tools exist, none have been designed to consider specific environments and management practices faced by elephants living and working in tourist camps. Methods: Using direct observations and interviews, the Elephant Welfare Assessment Tool (EWAT) was developed for tourist camp elephants using the Five Domains Model as a framework. Measures were selected based on peer-reviewed literature, existing standards and guidelines, and opinions from animal welfare experts working with zoo and tourist camp elephants. The EWAT differs from existing tools by including criteria on work activities and restraint methods ( Results: The initial tool included 18 animal-based and 21 resource-based measures across four domains: Nutrition ( Conclusions: This new assessment tool (EWAT) is a context-specific, holistic method designed to offer a practical means of conducting individual and institutional-level assessments of elephant welfare in tourist camps. It is based on the Five Domains Model using reliable and validated animal- and resource-based measures, data collection through direct observation and interviews, and a numerical scoring system. The tool includes several criteria applicable to tourist rather than zoo venues to make it more relevant to the challenges faced by working elephants in Asia.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareElephantsAnimal HusbandryAnimalsAsiaFemaleHumansMaleThailandTourismAnimal welfareAsiaAsian elephantAssessment toolTourismTourist elephantsWelfare assessment

Identifiers

PMID39484216
PMCPMC11526799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.