Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39484213›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Using a natural capital risk register to support the funding of seagrass habitat enhancement in Plymouth Sound.

Guy Hooper, Matthew Ashley, Tom Mullier, Martin Attrill, Amelia Sturgeon, Zoe Sydenham, Mark Parry, Katey Valentine, Sian Rees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guy HooperSchool of Biological and Marine Science, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Matthew AshleySchool of Biological and Marine Science, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Tom MullierSchool of Biological and Marine Science, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Martin AttrillSchool of Biological and Marine Science, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Amelia SturgeonTamar Estuaries Consultative Forum, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Zoe SydenhamPlymouth City Council, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Mark ParryOcean Conservation Trust, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.
Katey ValentineBeZero Carbon, London, United Kingdom.
Sian ReesSchool of Biological and Marine Science, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seagrass is an important marine habitat that provides benefits to society in the form of ecosystem services. Services include the provision of food via fisheries, the regulation of water quality and the ability to sequester and store carbon. In the UK, seagrass beds are in decline, increasing the risk of ecosystem service loss. Current efforts to protect, restore and create seagrass habitat, beyond spatial management measures, rely on grant funding and donations. Emerging carbon, biodiversity and wider ecosystem service markets offering potential revenue sources could facilitate the enhancement of seagrass habitat at scale. Participation in ecosystem service markets, requires that projects deliver on the ecosystem service benefits defined. As the benefits will have been paid for, there are risks associated with not delivering on ecosystem service benefits. It is important that the risk is clearly defined. In this study we further the marine natural capital and risk register approach and apply the method to a case study area to support the development of sustainable funding options for seagrass habitat enhancement in Plymouth Sound, UK. Habitat Suitability modelling is also used to map potential areas for seagrass habitat enhancement. We find that, in the Plymouth Sound area, the risk of loss of ecosystem services for subtidal seagrass habitats is, at present, high. This is primarily linked to the declining extent and condition of subtidal seagrass assets. Under current governance, all of Plymouth Sound's subtidal seagrass are within a Marine Protected Area, though this conservation designation does not guarantee that the seagrass bed is protected from damaging activity. Under current environmental conditions there is opportunity for widespread seagrass restoration and creation. Risk to seagrass beds and any future private funding could be reduced by governance actions that enable effective direct protection of the seagrass assets and mitigate harmful pressures ( Synthesis and Application: By assessing the risk to the status of seagrass assets through this approach, it is possible to determine the complementary governance actions needed to underpin investment in seagrass habitat enhancement. The methods are transferable to other locations where data exists to define the asset status. These specific findings are relevant nationally where similar vectors of risk (pressures) are identified.

Indexed as

Conservation of Water ResourcesEcosystemUnited KingdomEcosystem servicesMarine protected areasNature-based solutionsPlymouthRiskSeagrassSustainable FinanceZostera spp.

Identifiers

PMID39484213
PMCPMC11526789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.