ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Drug selection for inner ear therapy.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biodistribution and transport of intratympanically administered drugs in the inner ear using a porcine ex-vivo chamber model.Materials & design · 2026Article
- Drug Discovery Targeting Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors for Hearing Loss.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Engineered Inner Ear Drug Delivery Systems for Hearing Loss Treatment.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Dexamethasone Dosing of Human Perilymph Compared for Common Delivery Protocols Using Inner Ear Simulations.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2026Article
- Hearing restoration through hair cell regeneration: A review of recent advancements and current limitations.Hearing research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: One of the primary tenets in pharmacotherapy is that the applied drug must reach the target tissue at therapeutic concentration. For many therapies intended to treat hearing disorders it has become apparent that we have failed to achieve this goal, contributing to poor outcomes in several important clinical trials. The crux of the delivery problem is that small lipophilic molecules pass with relative ease through membranous boundaries of the body. This initially seems advantageous when the drug is applied intratympanically, enabling entry into perilymph through the round window membrane. Unfortunately, the same property also allows the drug to pass through endothelial cells of blood capillaries, allowing it to be eliminated from perilymph. Drugs that are eliminated rapidly as they diffuse along the cochlear scalae will only treat basal high-frequency cochlear regions and will not reach therapeutic concentrations in the apical regions of the human cochlea. Methods: We have used the FluidSim program, a computer model of the inner ear fluids, to derive perilymph elimination properties for 15 molecules from published and archival data sets, which are compared with calculated molecular properties. Results: Smaller, lipophilic drugs are shown to be eliminated from perilymph more rapidly, with half-times as fast as 17 min, compared to larger, polar ones, with half-times as long as 1,304 min (21.7 h). Discussion: Based on their molecular properties' drugs can be identified that distribute well along the cochlea when applied intratympanically. This excludes many drugs that have been used for, or are currently in development for, inner ear therapy. On the other hand, it opens a vast array of less-studied, larger molecules, many of which would be unsuitable for oral delivery (characterized as "not druglike") but representing promising candidates for local inner ear therapy. In the earliest stages of consideration, drugs need to be selected based on the properties which govern their ability to reach the appropriate target site and not whether they are efficacious in small animals or have high potency
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.