Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39484125›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024

Progress of Conductivity and Conduction Velocity Measured in Human and Animal Hearts.

Zhenyin Fu, Ruiqing Dong, Huanyong Zheng, Zefeng Wang, Boyang Cao, Jinghui Bai, Mingxia Ma, Zhanchun Song, Fuzhi Pan, Ling Xia and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhenyin FuCollege of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, 310058 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ruiqing DongDepartment of Cardiology, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, 215000 Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Huanyong ZhengSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, 116024 Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Zefeng WangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
Boyang CaoCollege of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, 310058 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jinghui BaiDepartment of General Medicine, Liaoning Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, 116024 Liaoning, China.
Mingxia MaDepartment of General Medicine, Liaoning Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, 116024 Liaoning, China.
Zhanchun SongDepartment of Cardiology, Fushun Central Hospital, 113006 Liaoning, China.
Fuzhi PanDepartment of General Medicine, Liaoning Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, 116024 Liaoning, China.
Ling XiaCollege of Biomedical Engineering & Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, 310058 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yongquan WuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, 100029 Beijing, China.
Shijie ZhouDepartment of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.
Dongdong DengSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, 116024 Dalian, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac conduction velocity (CV) is a critical electrophysiological characteristic of the myocardium, representing the speed at which electrical pulses propagate through cardiac tissue. It can be delineated into longitudinal, transverse, and normal components in the myocardium. The CV and its anisotropy ratio are crucial to both normal electrical conduction and myocardial contraction, as well as pathological conditions where it increases the risk of conduction block and reentry. This comprehensive review synthesizes longitudinal and transverse CV values from clinical and experimental studies of human infarct hearts, including findings from the isthmus and outer loop, alongside data derived from animal models. Additionally, we explore the anisotropic ratio of conductivities assessed through both animal and computational models. The review culminates with a synthesis of scientific evidence that guides the selection of CV and its corresponding conductivity in cardiac modeling, particularly emphasizing its application in patient-specific cardiac arrhythmia modeling.

Indexed as

anisotropic ratioconduction velocityconductivityisthmusouter loop

Identifiers

PMID39484125
PMCPMC11522836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.