ArticleKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery2024
Comparison of the effect of chest tube diameter on drainage rate and tube performance in patients with pleural effusion. A cross-sectional study.
Article in Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chest tube insertion is one of the essential procedures that is performed for patients suffering from pneumothorax or pleural effusion. Choosing the best chest tube size, with maximum emptying and minimum discomfort and side effects, is one of the most important factors in patient care, while the best tube size is highly a matter of debate. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the difference between the groups with different chest tube sizes regarding the time needed for drainage, the necessity of additional invasive procedures, or pain severity. Material and methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients with pleural effusion, were entered into the study. patients were randomly divided into two groups based on their chest tube size: size 28 and size 32. Then, the duration of complete effusion emptying and the duration of the chest tube insertion was evaluated. Results: According to this study, 26 (65.0%) participants were male. The duration for complete evacuation of pleural effusion varied from 3 to 10 days. The average duration of chest tube retention in the group of patients with chest tube sized 28 and 32 were 5.82, and 5.91 days, respectively; The average pain intensity in the group of patients with chest tube sized 28 and 32 were 6.71 ±1.02 and 6.48 ±1.21 units, respectively. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in how long the chest tube needed to stay in place to fully drain the pleural effusion. They also didn't differ significantly in the need for additional invasive procedures such as VATS, and secondary chest tube insertion. There was no notable difference for pain severity and the need for painkillers in the two groups of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.