Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39484095›Full record

ReviewBiology methods & protocols2024

Live cell fluorescence microscopy-an end-to-end workflow for high-throughput image and data analysis.

Jakub Zahumensky, Jan Malinsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jakub ZahumenskyDepartment of Functional Organization of Biomembranes, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-9789
Jan MalinskyDepartment of Functional Organization of Biomembranes, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Videnska 1083, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence microscopy images of biological samples contain valuable information but require rigorous analysis for accurate and reliable determination of changes in protein localization, fluorescence intensity, and morphology of the studied objects. Traditionally, cells for microscopy are immobilized using chemicals, which can introduce stress. Analysis often focuses only on colocalization and involves manual segmentation and measurement, which are time-consuming and can introduce bias. Our new workflow addresses these issues by gently immobilizing cells using a small agarose block on a microscope coverslip. This approach is suitable for cell-walled cells (yeast, fungi, plants, bacteria), facilitates their live imaging under conditions close to their natural environment and enables the addition of chemicals during time-lapse experiments. The primary focus of the protocol is on the presented analysis workflow, which is applicable to virtually any cell type-we describe cell segmentation using the Cellpose software followed by automated analysis of a multitude of parameters using custom-written Fiji (ImageJ) macros. The results can be easily processed using the provided R markdown scripts or available graphing software. Our method facilitates unbiased batch analysis of large datasets, improving the efficiency and accuracy of fluorescence microscopy research. The reported sample preparation protocol and Fiji macros were used in our recent publications:

Indexed as

automatedblindedCellposecellsdata analysisFijiImageJmicroscopyunbiasedyeast

Identifiers

PMID39484095
PMCPMC11525050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.