ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with different motor evoked potential status: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- TMS-Derived Neurophysiological Measures of Corticospinal Excitability, Intracortical Excitability, and Interhemispheric Interactions Associated With Post-Stroke Motor Recovery: A Systematic Review.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Additional Effects of Facilitatory Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Inhibitory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Unaffected Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex for Motor Recovery in Subacute Ischemic Stroke Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The safety of ipsilateral high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in brain tumour patients.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) on motor function and cortical excitability in stroke patients with different motor evoked potential (MEP) status. Methods: A total of 80 stroke patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial and divided into two groups according to MEP status (- or +) of lesioned hemisphere. Then, each group was randomly assigned to receive either active or sham LF-rTMS. In addition to conventional rehabilitation, all participants received 20 sessions of rTMS at 1 Hz frequency through the active or the sham coil over 4 weeks. Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) and Barthel Index (BI), bilateral resting motor threshold (rMT), amplitude of Motor evoked potential (MEP) and Central Motor Conduction Time (CMCT), and Interhemispheric asymmetry (IHA) were blindly assessed at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment, respectively. Results: At 4 weeks after intervention, FMA and NIHSS changed scores in 1 Hz MEP(+) group were significantly higher than those in the other three groups ( Conclusion: The effects of LF-rTMS on motor recovery and cortical excitability were more effective in stroke patients with MEP than those with no MEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.