ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Characterization of ligand-receptor pair in acute myeloid leukemia: a scoring model for prognosis, therapeutic response, and T cell dysfunction.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The significance of ligand-receptor (LR) pair interactions in the progression of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been the focus of numerous studies. However, the relationship between LR pairs and the prognosis of AML, as well as their impact on treatment outcomes, is not fully elucidated. Methods: Leveraging data from the TCGA-LAML cohort, we mapped out the LR pair interactions and distinguished specific molecular subtypes, with each displaying distinct biological characteristics. These subtypes exhibited varying mutation landscapes, pathway characteristics, and immune infiltration levels. Further insight into the immune microenvironment among these subtypes revealed disparities in immune cell abundance. Results: Notably, one subtype showed a higher prevalence of CD8 T cells and plasma cells, suggesting increased adaptive immune activities. Leveraging a multivariate Lasso regression, we formulated an LR pair-based scoring model, termed "LR.score," to classify patients based on prognostic risk. Our findings underscored the association between elevated LR scores and T-cell dysfunction in AML. This connection highlights the LR score's potential as both a prognostic marker and a guide for personalized therapeutic interventions. Moreover, our LR.score revealed substantial survival prediction capacities in an independent AML cohort. We highlighted CLEC11A, ICAM4, ITGA4, and AVP as notably AML-specific. Discussion: qRT-PCR analysis on AML versus normal bone marrow samples confirmed the significant downregulation of CLEC11A, ITGA4, ICAM4, and AVP in AML, suggesting their inverse biomarker potential in AML. In summary, this study illuminates the significance of the LR pair network in predicting AML prognosis, offering avenues for more precise treatment strategies tailored to individual patient profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.