ArticleOncology letters2024
Plasma exchange as an effective treatment for cytokine release syndrome following T cell receptor‑engineered T cell immunotherapy: A case report.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cytokine release syndrome in solid tumors.Cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T-cell receptor-engineered T-cell (TCR-T) immunotherapy is a promising approach for the treatment of solid tumors. However, TCR-T therapy can result in severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS), thus limiting its therapeutic application. The present study reported the case of a patient with TCR-T-related CRS, which was treated successfully with plasma exchange (PE). A 35-year-old male patient, who was diagnosed with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with lung metastases, was enrolled in a clinical trial for hepatitis B virus surface antigen-specific TCR-expressing autologous T-cell therapy for HBV-related HCC after failing multiple lines of targeted immunotherapy and local treatments. Therefore, TCR-Ts were infused after peripheral blood mononuclear cell collection, engineering and lymphodepletion chemotherapy. However, following engineered T-cell reinfusion, the patient developed a fever, hypotension, edema, multiple serous effusion and acute kidney injury, and was consequently diagnosed with grade 3 CRS and transferred to the Intensive Care Unit. The patient received three daily PE sessions (3,000 ml of fresh frozen plasma per session), renal replacement therapy, tocilizumab and 1,000 mg pulse methylprednisolone for 3 days. Following treatment, the patient's hemodynamic condition was stabilized and the C-reactive protein, ferritin and IL-6 levels were markedly reduced. During follow-up, a stable disease state was exhibited by the liver cancer and lung metastatic lesions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reporting PE as a treatment approach for managing CRS following TCR-T therapy for solid tumors. The present study demonstrated that blood purification treatments, such as PE, which target inflammatory mediators and restore the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, could be a notable component in managing severe CRS associated with engineered T-cell treatment. However, additional clinical and translational studies are needed to further understand the mechanisms of T-cell immunotherapy to treat patients with solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.