Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483958›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2024

Stakeholder perceptions of physical literacy: results from a national consultation in England.

Michael J Duncan, Inimfon Essiet, Liezel Hurter, William M Roberts, Kiara Lewis, Hannah Goss, Jade L Morris, Daniel D Bingham, Wesley O'Brien, Lisa M Barnett and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michael J DuncanCentre for Physical Activity, Sport and Exercise Science, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Inimfon EssietResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Liezel HurterResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
William M RobertsSchool of Sport and Human Movement, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Kiara LewisSchool of Health Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Hannah GossSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Jade L MorrisFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Daniel D BinghamFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Wesley O'BrienSchool of Education, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Lisa M BarnettInstitute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Cara ShearerSport Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrew Daly-SmithFaculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Lawrence FoweatherResearch Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of evidence of stakeholder perspective and understanding of physical literacy among relevant stakeholders from England. As part of research commissioned by Sport England to develop a physical literacy consensus statement for England, this study presents findings from the first national consultation with stakeholders in England. Methods: One hundred and ninety-three individual stakeholders (50.3%) from education, community sport, national governing bodies of sport, physical activity and sport coaching sectors completed an online survey consisting of fixed item and open ended questions designed to examine their knowledge, understanding, perceptions and practices relating to physical literacy. Results: Responses from stakeholders suggested there was confusion in use of the term physical literacy in practice and confusion regarding the definition of physical literacy. Most respondents suggested they were involved in physical literacy related activity and understood the term. However, when probed the physical literacy related activity they referred to was likely not actually physical literacy related. Understanding of the term physical literacy was inconsistent in general. Stakeholders considered the affective, social, physical and cognitive areas (domains) of learning to be most important for developing a positive relationship with movement, sport and physical activity for life. Conclusions: While stakeholders are aware of the term "physical literacy" and hold value of it within their practice, there remain key misconceptions relating to what physical literacy is, and debate as to whether any existing definitions truly capture the construct of physical literacy.

Indexed as

active lifestylescompetenceconfidenceknowledge and understandingmotivationphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID39483958
PMCPMC11524871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.