ReviewCureus2024
Dietary Interventions in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes, Microbiota Changes, and Inflammatory Markers.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of Specific Probiotic Strains in Subtypes of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Adherence to EAT-Lancet diet and odds of irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia: the Isfahan functional disorders (ISFUN) study.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review synthesizes findings from 12 studies to evaluate the effectiveness of dietary interventions in managing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), with a focus on low-FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) diets, probiotics, and prebiotics. The review rigorously follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and includes studies selected through comprehensive database searches. In adults diagnosed with IBS, this review assesses how effective dietary interventions, specifically low-FODMAP diets, probiotics, and prebiotics, are compared to standard management or placebo in improving clinical outcomes, modifying gut microbiota composition, and reducing inflammatory markers. Our analysis reveals that low-FODMAP diets consistently alleviate IBS symptoms and improve quality of life. However, the effectiveness of probiotics and prebiotics varies, with outcomes dependent on specific strains and individual patient microbiota profiles. The studies demonstrate significant improvements in gastrointestinal symptoms and microbiota composition, highlighting the potential of dietary strategies to beneficially modify gut health. However, the research points to the necessity of personalizing dietary approaches based on individual responses and microbiota profiles to optimize treatment efficacy. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the AMSTAR 2 tool for systematic reviews, with varying degrees of bias across the studies. This review identifies gaps in the long-term efficacy of these interventions and calls for more extensive trials to explore their sustained impacts. Our findings suggest that dietary management should be integrated into routine IBS treatment protocols and emphasize the need for further research to establish standardized dietary recommendations tailored to patient-specific characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.