Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483918›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Developing a Comprehensive Inventory to Define Harm Reduction Housing.

Sofia Zaragoza, Joseph Silcox, Sabrina Rapisarda, Charlie Summers, Patricia Case, Clara To, Avik Chatterjee, Alexander Walley, Miriam Komaromy, Traci Green

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sofia ZaragozaThe Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University.
Joseph SilcoxThe Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University.
Sabrina RapisardaThe Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University.
Charlie SummersThe Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University.
Patricia CaseNortheastern University, Bouve College of Health Sciences.
Clara ToGrayken Center for Addiction and Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center.
Avik ChatterjeeGrayken Center for Addiction and Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center.
Alexander WalleyGrayken Center for Addiction and Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center.
Miriam KomaromyGrayken Center for Addiction and Clinical Addiction Research and Education (CARE) Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center.
Traci GreenThe Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University.

Funding

Rapid measurement of novel harm reduction housing on HIV risk, treatment uptake, drug use and supplyR21DA058581 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GREEN, TRACI C · 2023 to 2024
$471k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA058581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The City of Boston has faced unprecedented challenges with substance use amidst changes to the illicit drug supply and increased visibility of homelessness. Among its responses, Boston developed six low threshold harm reduction housing (HRH) sites geared towards supporting the housing needs of people who use drugs (PWUD) and addressing health and safety concerns around geographically concentrated tent encampments. HRH sites are transitional supportive housing that adhere to a "housing first" approach where abstinence is not required and harm reduction services and supports are co-located. Despite the importance of HRH, the specific characteristics and operations of these sites are not well understood. This study sought to address this gap by cataloging the common features of Boston's HRH sites to generate a comprehensive inventory tool for evaluating implementation of harm reduction strategies at transitional housing locations. Methods: We collected data between June and September 2023 and included semi-structured qualitative interviews with HRH staff (n = 19), ethnographic observations and photos at six HRH sites. Candidate inventory components were derived through triangulation of the data. Two expert medical staff unaffiliated with data collection reviewed a draft inventory measuring awareness and utility of HRH inventory components. We then pilot tested the inventory with 3 HRH residents across two sites for readability and reliability. Inventory performance was further tested in a survey of 106 residents. Results: HRH staff identified best practices, resources, and policies in HRH sites that were further contextualized with ethnographic field notes. Common to all were overdose prevention protocols, behavioral policies, security measures, and harm reduction supplies distribution. The initial 44-item inventory of services, policies and site best practices was further refined with expert and participant feedback and application, then finalized to generate a 32-item inventory. Residents identified and valued harm reduction services; medical supports were highly valued but less utilized. Conclusion: The HRH inventory comprehensively assesses harm reduction provision and residents' awareness and perceived helpfulness of HRH operational components. Characterizing the critical components of HRH through this tool will aid in standardizing the concept and practice of HRH for PWUD and may assist other cities in planning and implementing HRH.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionHousingOutcome MeasurementQualitative ResearchSubstance Use

Identifiers

PMID39483918
PMCPMC11527206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.