Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483877›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

Feasibility and acceptability of a life skills and reproductive health empowerment interventionfor young newly married women in Rajasthan, India: A pre-post convergent mixed methods pilot study.

Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan, Sumeet Patil, Debangana Das, Anshuman Paul, Payal Sharma, Ankur Kachhwaha, Usha Choudhary, Nadia Diamond-Smith

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06320964 (Feasibility and Acceptability of a Group-based Life Skills-integrated Reproductive Health Empowerment Intervention for Newly Married Women, Husbands, and Mothers-in-law), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06320964 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Group-based Life Skills-integrated Reproductive Health Empowerment Intervention for Newly Married Women, Husbands, and Mothers-in-law

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2023 to 2024Enrolled42ConditionsFeasibility, Acceptability, Family Planning, Unintended PregnancyArmsTARANG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lakshmi GopalakrishnanUniversity of California San Francisco.ORCID 0000-0003-3226-9090
Sumeet PatilNetwork for Economics Engineering Research and Management: Neerman.
Debangana DasNetwork for Economics Engineering Research and Management: Neerman.
Anshuman PaulNetwork for Economics Engineering Research and Management: Neerman.
Payal SharmaOrange Tree Foundation.
Ankur KachhwahaOrange Tree Foundation.
Usha ChoudharyVikalp Sansthan.
Nadia Diamond-SmithUniversity of California San Francisco.

Funding

The impact of group-based life skills and health empowerment for young, married, women to avoid unintended pregnancies in India.R01HD108252 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NADIA GRIFFI DIAMOND-SMITH · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD108252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Newly married young women face increased susceptibility to adverse health outcomes, social isolation, and disempowerment, yet interventions targeting this vulnerable group remain limited. We examined the feasibility and acceptability of TARANG, a life skills and reproductive health empowerment intervention, developed for and with young newly married women. Methods: We recruited 42 newly married women as participants in our study. We conducted a convergent mixed-methods, single-group cluster pilot study to the intervention in which 41 participants (retention rate=97.6%) completed both baseline and endline surveys in July 2023 and January 2024, respectively. We assessed three primary outcomes--feasibility using proportion of participants who completed at least 50% sessions, acceptability using proportion completely satisfied/somewhat satisfied with TARANG and usefulness using proportion who found TARANG useful/somewhat useful. We conducted in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 12 participants to understand intervention acceptance and usefulness of the intervention and 6 program staff and moderators to understand barriers to implementing the intervention. We analyzed the quantitative data with descriptive statistics and qualitative data using thematic analysis. We triangulated data from monitoring data filled by moderators, quantitative surveys with participants, and qualitative data. Results: In the pilot study, 35/42 participants had completed at least one session. Overall, 82% participants attended at least 50% of the sessions. Among those who attended at least 1 session,97% were satisfied/somewhat satisfied with the intervention and 100% of participants found the intervention to be useful/somewhat useful. Qualitative findings reveal participants' appreciation for open discussions on sensitive topics, such as family planning, and highlight the intervention's role in filling knowledge gaps and fostering social connections, better sense of agency and improved relationships with mothers-in-law and husbands. While barriers to consistent participation were identified, feedback informed refinements to the intervention for the main trial, including session modifications, increased engagement strategies, and integration of educational videos. Conclusion: Our community-based participatory approach, developed with input from end users, demonstrated not only high acceptability and feasibility but also had many benefits for newly married women in rural/tribal Rajasthan. Our findings also led to adaptations that may enhance delivery of, and satisfaction with TARANG intervention, which will be tested with a larger sample in a rigorous cluster randomized controlled trial in Rajasthan, India. ClinicalTrialsgov: The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06320964). Registered retrospectively on 13 March 2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06320964.

Indexed as

adolescent girlsempowerment interventionsfamily planninggender equalityhealth educationmarried girlsntraceptionrural and tribal communitiesSouth Asia

Identifiers

PMID39483877
PMCPMC11527357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.