ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2024
Beyond lines of treatment: embracing early high-efficacy disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis management.
Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aging with multiple sclerosis and associated prevalence, incidence, comorbidities and healthcare utilization patterns in a population based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Spinal cord reserve is associated with multi-dimensional clinical resilience in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- The impact of age on efficacy and safety of disease modifying treatment-insights from the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Registry.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Comparative profiling of neurological and biomarker status in type 1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional observational study.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Article
- Genetic Influences on Disease-Modifying Therapy Response in Multiple Sclerosis: Current Insights and Future Directions.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
- Comparative effectiveness of anti-CD20 therapies and S1P receptor modulators in late-onset multiple sclerosis: real-world evidence from the MSBase registry.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- Combining magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potentials enhances machine learning prediction of multiple sclerosis disability worsening.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of Rituximab in rElapsiNg Multiple SclErosis previously treated with hiGhly-Active Disease modifying thErapies (RENEGADE study).Journal of neurology · 2025Observational
- The use of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: recommendations from an expert Delphi consensus.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Neuroprotective strategies in multiple sclerosis: a status update and emerging paradigms.Expert review of neurotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Utility of Hybrid PET/MR Neuroimaging in Inflammatory Demyelination and Encephalitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring proteomic immunoprofiles: common neurological and immunological pathways in multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes mellitus.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Neurologists' Openness to Evidence-Based Innovation in Multiple Sclerosis Care: Individual and Structural Determinants.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Article
- Multiple sclerosis as a biological and clinical continuum: from risk factors to the early stages of disease.Frontiers in neurologyReview
- Predictors of initiating high-efficacy vs. platform therapies as first-line disease-modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- European experience of cladribine tablets in elderly patients with multiple sclerosis: Could it be the last treatment?Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in multiple sclerosis (MS) management have shifted perspectives on treatment strategies, advocating for the early initiation of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (heDMTs). This perspective review discusses the rationale, benefits, and challenges associated with early heDMT initiation, reflecting on the obsolescence of the traditional "first-line" and "second-line" treatment classifications. The article emerges from the last update of the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Neurology on the treatment of MS. During its development, there was a recognized need to further discuss the concept of treatment lines and the early use of heDMTs. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world studies suggests that early heDMT initiation leads to improved clinical outcomes, including reduced relapse rates, slowed disease progression, and decreased radiological activity, especially in younger patients or those in early disease stages. Despite the historical belief that heDMTs involve more risks and adverse events compared to moderate-efficacy DMTs (meDMTs), some studies have reported comparable safety profiles between early heDMTs and meDMTs, though long-term safety data are still lacking. The review also addresses the need for a personalized approach based on patient characteristics, prognostic factors, and preferences, explores the importance of therapeutic inertia, and highlights the evolving landscape of international and national guidelines that increasingly advocate for early intensive treatment approaches. The article also addresses the challenges of ensuring access to these therapies and the importance of further research to establish long-term safety and effectiveness of DMTs in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.