ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2024
Therapeutic effect of an inhaled levodopa dry powder formulation on off episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Limited treatment options with a rapid onset of action are available to treat off episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Therefore, the development of rapid onset formulations, for instance with levodopa, is warranted, which was the reason to investigate an inhalable formulation of levodopa. Objectives: The primary objective was to determine the duration until maximum effect is reached of inhaled levodopa on the improvement of motor function of PD patients. The secondary objective was to compare the time until maximal effect and the maximal effect of inhaled levodopa versus oral levodopa. Design: Open-label randomized two-way one-period crossover trial. Methods: Nine PD patients in the 'off state' received one dose of inhaled levodopa (90 mg) from Cyclops® and one dose of levodopa orodispersible tablet (100 mg) on two consecutive days in a randomized order. A timed tapping test, Timed Up and Go test (TUG test) and Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III score were performed pre-dose and on set time points up to 90 min post-dose as measure for motor function. In addition, blood samples were taken for a pharmacokinetic evaluation ( Results: The maximal effect of inhaled levodopa was reached at 30 min (tapping test), at 75 min (TUG test) and at 60 min (UPDRS III). The positive effect on the UPDRS was statistically significant within 20 min after inhalation. After oral administration, Conclusion: Inhaled levodopa from Cyclops Trial registration: The study protocol was approved by the local ethics board 'Regionale toetsingscommissie patiëntgebonden onderzoek' (RTPO) in Leeuwarden, The Netherlands (approval number RTPO1019). The study was registered in in the Dutch trial register (LTR) with identification number NL6876. From 5 March 2024 on, the research data on onderzoekmetmensen.nl are known as 'Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands' (OMON). This means the use of the name LTR has thus been dropped. Now, it is registered in the OMON with the same identification number (NL6876, Effectiveness of inhaled levodopa in PD | Research with human participants (onderzoekmetmensen.nl)). All patients provided written informed consent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.