ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Research trends in nutritional interventions for stroke: a bibliometric analysis and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Mapping the evolution of botanical interventions for diabetic neuropathy: a two-database bibliometric landscape from 2005 to mid-2025.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Dietary and lifestyle interventions for overweight and obesity in post-acute stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Analysis of nutritional status and functional recovery outcomes in stroke patients under nursing care.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- A bibliometric and visualized analysis of interventional treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (from 2004 to 2023).Neurosurgical review · 2025Review
- The Application of Checklist in Chronic Disease: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- The predictive value of the pre-PCI prognostic nutritional index combined with the geriatric nutritional risk index for one-year outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusion.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the past 23 years, there has been a thorough analysis of literature concerning nutritional interventions, nutrients, and feeding approaches related to stroke. Furthermore, a scientific knowledge map was established, elucidating the current state of research, examining its development and trends, and offering new research viewpoints for the future. This study aimed to investigate global and emerging research trends in nutritional interventions for stroke from 2000 to 2023 through bibliometric analysis. Methods: A bibliometric analysis of literature from the Core Collection of Scientific Networks for the years 2000-2022 was conducted. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and bibliometric graphical software were used to identify major contributors to publications, including authors, countries, institutions, journals, references, and keywords. Results: The bibliometric analysis yielded a total of 464 publications. This is a gradually increasing number in terms of the number of publications during the study period. China had the highest number of publications. Clinical Nutrition" was the journal with the highest number of relevant publications, and the most commonly used keywords were "stroke," "nutrition" and "malnutrition." Conclusion: These analyses reveal research trends in nutritional therapy for stroke from 2000 to 2023 and point to prospective research frontiers. This study provides a deeper understanding of what nutritional treatment of stroke entails and provides guidance and support for future research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.