Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483772›Full record

ReviewNeuroSci2022

Current Opinion on the Use of c-Fos in Neuroscience.

Sandra Yasbeth Lara Aparicio, Ángel de Jesús Laureani Fierro, Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Rebeca Toledo Cárdenas, Luis Isauro García Hernández, Genaro Alfonso Coria Ávila, Fausto Rojas Durán, María Elena Hernández Aguilar, Jorge Manzo Denes, Lizbeth Donají Chi-Castañeda and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroSci, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cell-Intrinsic Regulation of Epilepsy-Associated Pathology by mTORC1 and mTORC2.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sandra Yasbeth Lara AparicioInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-5834
Ángel de Jesús Laureani FierroDoctorado en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.
Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda AbreuInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8519-5473
Rebeca Toledo CárdenasInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.
Luis Isauro García HernándezInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.
Genaro Alfonso Coria ÁvilaInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1663-836X
Fausto Rojas DuránInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.
María Elena Hernández AguilarInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1617-5636
Jorge Manzo DenesInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8659-4759
Lizbeth Donají Chi-CastañedaInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.
César Antonio Pérez EstudilloInstituto en Investigaciones Cerebrales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz C.P. 91190, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9724-3281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For years, the biochemical processes that are triggered by harmful and non-harmful stimuli at the central nervous system level have been extensively studied by the scientific community through numerous techniques and animal models. For example, one of these techniques is the use of immediate expression genes, which is a useful, accessible, and reliable method for observing and quantifying cell activation. It has been shown that both the

Indexed as

animal modelsbrain activitycell activationc-Fosearly genestimulitranscription

Identifiers

PMID39483772
PMCPMC11523728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.