ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2024
Support vector machine classification of patients with depression based on resting-state electroencephalography.
Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered functional brain network in adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury: a resting-state EEG study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Exploring Machine Learning Classification of Movement Phases in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients: A Controlled EEG-tDCS Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression is one of the most common mental disorders. Although depression is typically diagnosed by identifying specific symptoms and through history, no recognized standard for depression diagnosis exists. This assures the development of objective diagnostic tools for depression. Objectives: We investigated the differences in the resting-state electroencephalograms (EEGs) of patients with depression and healthy controls (HCs) to distinguish patients from HCs by using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier with the following two feature selection approaches: t test and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Methods: We used the EEG data from the Patient Repository of EEG Data + Computational Tools; this study included 21 patients with depressive disorder (MDD) and 21 HCs. The relative frequency power, alpha interhemispheric asymmetry, left-right coherence, strength, clustering coefficient (CC), shortest path length, sample entropy (SampEn), multiscale entropy (MSE), and detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) data were extracted to determine candidate EEG features associated with depression. Results: With the t-test selection, the SVM classifier demonstrated the highest performance with the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 96.66%, 95.93%, and 97.550% for the eye-open condition and 91.33%, 90.59%, and 91.81% for the eye-closed condition, respectively. For comparisons of features in the 2 selection approaches, the most influential features were relative frequency power and left-right coherence. Conclusion: Using this information to distinguish patients with MDD from HC subjects with the SVM classifier resulted in a mean accuracy over 90%. Although this result may not be robust enough for clinical applications, further exploration is necessary given the simplicity, objectivity, and efficiency of the classifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.