Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483709›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2024

Role of Artificial intelligence model in prediction of low back pain using T2 weighted MRI of Lumbar spine.

Ali Muhaimil, Saikiran Pendem, Niranjana Sampathilla, Priya P S, Kaushik Nayak, Krishnaraj Chadaga, Anushree Goswami, Obhuli Chandran M, Abhijit Shirlal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Potential applications of artificial intelligence in pain management: a scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Radiomics and Back Pain.Global spine journal · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali MuhaimilDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.
Saikiran PendemDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7933-1192
Niranjana SampathillaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-360X
Priya P SDepartment of Radio Diagnosis and Imaging, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-5733
Kaushik NayakDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.
Krishnaraj ChadagaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Anushree GoswamiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Obhuli Chandran MDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5515-6377
Abhijit ShirlalDepartment of Medical Imaging Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, Manipal, 576104, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2726-1721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP), the primary cause of disability, is the most common musculoskeletal disorder globally and the primary cause of disability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are inconclusive and less sensitive for identifying and classifying patients with LBP. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the role of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the prediction of LBP using T2 weighted MRI image of the lumbar spine. Methods: This was a prospective case-control study. A total of 200 MRI patients (100 cases and controls each) referred for lumbar spine and whole spine screening were included. The scans were performed using 3.0 Tesla MRI (United Imaging Healthcare). T2 weighted images of the lumbar spine were segmented to extract radiomic features. Machine learning (ML) models, such as random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, K-nearest neighbors, adaboost, and deep learning methods (DL), such as ResNet and GoogleNet, were used, and performance measures were calculated. Results: Our study showed that Random forest and AdaBoost are the most reliable ML models for predicting LBP. Random forest showed high performance with area under curve (AUC) values from 0.83 to 0.88 across all lumbar vertebrae and L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 intervertebral discs (IVDs), with AUCs of 0.88 the highest at L5-S1 IVD (0.92). Adaboost demonstrated high performance at the L2-L5 vertebrae with AUC values of 0.82 to 0.90, with the highest AUC (0.97) at the L5-S1 IVD. Among the DL models, GoogleNet outperformed the other models at 30 epochs with an accuracy of 0.85, followed by ResNet 18 (30 epochs) with an accuracy of 0.84. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that ML and DL models can effectively predict LBP from MRI T2 weighted image of the lumbar spine. ML and DL models could also enhance the diagnostic accuracy of LBP, potentially leading to better patient management and outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLow Back PainLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesDeep learningintervertebral discslow back painlumbar vertebraeMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39483709
PMCPMC11525099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.