ArticleJournal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery
Study to compare the efficacy of 50% glycolic acid with 65% trichloroacetic acid in the treatment of atrophic acne scar by CROSS technique.
Article in Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Use of Chemical Reconstruction of Skin Scars (CROSS) Method With Trichloroacetic Acid (TCA) for Atrophic Scars: A Comprehensive Review on Application Techniques, Adjunct Therapies, and Complications.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Acne scars often become challenging to treat with satisfactory results. The chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) technique has been used with high concentrations of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) which often produces unacceptable side effects. There is a dearth of data, with 50% glycolic acid (GA) for the same indication in the management of acne scars in the Indian population. This study aimed to assess the clinical response of acne scars after the application of 50% GA with that after the use of 65% TCA in a similar manner. Material and Methods: An institution-based prospective comparative study was performed with patients aged 16-45 years of either sex with acne scars and not been treated within the past 1 year. Subjects were assigned to receive one of the formulations (50% GA [Group A] and 65% TCA [Group B]). Grading of scars was done on day 1 and day 35 based on patients' assessment on a four-point visual scale and physicians' assessment by the Goodman-Baron qualitative global acne scar grading scale. The procedure was repeated every fortnightly for three such. Data were analyzed by Statistica version 6 (Tulsa, Oklahoma: StatSoft Inc. 2001). Results: The visual improvement scale of patients showed 41.38% ( Conclusion: Improvement is best observed with 65% TCA. Adverse effects were noted more with 65% TCA, especially acneiform eruption which was lacking in the previous studies. GA can be a safer alternative to TCA with acceptable results. Our study opens the scientific window for future research on different concentrations of GA as a CROSS agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.