ReviewJournal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery
Physics of fractional microneedle radiofrequency - A review.
Review in Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of a Topical Skincare Regimen with Tripeptide/Hexapeptide following Aesthetic Procedures: Analysis of Two Randomized, Split-Face Trials in Asian Subjects.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Fractional microporation-guided delivery of nanoencapsulated drugs for enhanced cutaneous and follicular absorption: a comparison of ablative laser and radiofrequency microneedling.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Beyond Lifting: Superficial-Targeted Monopolar Radiofrequency for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Recent Developments in Microneedle Biosensors for Biomedical and Agricultural Applications.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Microneedle radiofrequency for skin rejuvenation: bridging image-derived metrics and photographic assessment.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Radiation-induced skin injury: a review of pathophysiology, assessment, management, and re-irradiation protocols.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractional microneedle radiofrequency (RF) is a novel device that is gaining popularity in the treatment of many esthetic and dermatological conditions. The encouraging effectiveness and side-effect profile, along with little or no recovery time makes it an attractive therapeutic option. The device allows non-thermal penetration of microneedles into the dermis followed by RF-induced coagulation. The aim of this article is to provide a thorough understanding of the working principle and physics of this technology so that the clinicians can modulate its various parameters for effective treatment of a variety of dermatological conditions in all skin types. Methods used for locating, selecting, extracting, and synthesizing data include usage of key words such as microneedling, fractional, and RF using multiple search engines such as PubMed and Google search. Multiple articles were surveyed and finally, 30 articles including a few chapters from the textbook were refined into our search. This article is an attempt to simplify the physics of fractional microneedling RF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.