ArticleSAGE open medicine2024
In silico prediction of some pharmacokinetic, safety, biological activity and molecular docking studies of 1-piperazine indole hybrid with nicotinic amide and nicotinic acid and their analogues.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In silico predictions are now being utilized in drug discovery and design to assess the physicochemical, pharmacokinetics, and safety properties of compounds at the beginning of the drug discovery process. This early evaluation of the physicochemical, pharmacokinetics, and safety properties of compounds helps the researchers to invest their time and resources only in the best prospective lead compounds by eliminating compounds with a low chance of success. Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore a promising lead compound designed from 1-piperazine indole hybrid with nicotinic amide and nicotinic acid analogs targeted on Results: The physicochemical, safety, pharmacokinetic, and biological activity properties of those molecules were predicted by using ADMETlab 2.0, ACD labs Chem Sketch software version 14.0, Molinspiration software, and MolPredictX online tool. Our results indicate that several promising candidates exhibit favorable characteristics. Based on Molinspiration software both nicotinic acid and nicotinic amide derivatives showed higher kinase inhibitor activity and all nicotinic acid derivatives revealed enzyme inhibitors and GPCR ligand activity. According to the MolPredictX online tool, the most biologically active derivatives were NA-4, NA-11, and NAD-11. Conclusion: Overall, our findings offer valuable insights into the potential efficacy and safety of these compounds. It appears that almost all of the compounds have successfully passed the pharmacokinetic evaluations and integration of nicotinic acid into indole appears to be more beneficial than nicotinic amide regarding certain biological activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.