Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483601›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Optimal Entry Point and Trajectory for Pedicle Screws to Avoid Superior Facet Joint Violation and Pedicle Penetration.

Hüseyin Doğu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hüseyin DoğuNeurosurgery, Atlas University Medicine Hospital, Istanbul, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Accuracy is crucial in surgeries involving pedicle screws. This study aimed to determine the optimal screw entry points and trajectory angles for the pedicle screw technique used in the surgical treatment of lumbar instability. Methods To achieve this goal, a comparison was made between the screw entry points and trajectories determined using the commonly used intersection technique and those created in a three-dimensional (3D) simulation environment. Thirty-two cases of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, selected from surgeries between 2018 and 2023, were included. Preoperative lumbar computed tomography (CT) images were converted into 3D models, and simulations for pedicle screw placement were conducted. Results Using the intersection technique, upper facet damage was noted in 31.3% of L1, 37.5% of L2, 6.3% of L3, and 31.3% of L5 segments. Adjustments to entry points and angles in the 3D environment were made to determine optimal trajectories. The revised screw angles showed statistically significant improvements at L1, L2, and L5 segments compared to the intersection technique. Conclusions The intersection technique does not appear safe in preserving the superior facet joint. A more lateral and caudal pedicle entry should be preferred in the upper segments, and at L5, a more lateral pedicle entry should be used. Consequently, the screw angles should be adjusted accordingly.

Indexed as

lumbar facet jointlumbar spondylolisthesispedicle breachpedicle screw placementscrew accuracy

Identifiers

PMID39483601
PMCPMC11527514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.