ReviewCureus2024
Procalcitonin as an Early Marker of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage in Postoperative Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The timely identification of colorectal anastomotic leakage (CAL) is still a significant challenge, and identifying reliable markers is essential to minimize patient morbidity and mortality. While procalcitonin (PCT) has shown promise as a biomarker for CAL, its effectiveness must be specifically evaluated in colorectal cancer patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the mean differences in PCT levels between individuals with and without CAL who underwent colorectal surgery for colorectal cancer. Methodology A comprehensive search of the "PubMed," "Scopus," and "Web of Science" databases was carried out, covering studies published through April 2024. The objective was to identify studies examining PCT levels in colorectal cancer patients who underwent colorectal surgery, with a particular focus on the occurrence of CAL. Data on the mean of PCT levels in CAL and non-CAL patients were extracted from the selected studies. The mean differences in PCT levels were subsequently analyzed for each postoperative day (POD). Results Seventeen articles were selected for inclusion in this systematic review. The statistical analysis included five eligible articles that assessed PCT levels in groups exclusively involving patients with colorectal cancer. The findings showed no significant increase in PCT levels in CAL patients compared to non-CAL patients on any POD when a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the results. Conclusions To date, PCT levels should not be regarded as early indicators of CAL after colorectal surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Additional research is necessary to evaluate if PCT could be a dependable marker for CAL in this particular setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.