ArticleCureus2024
Outcomes of Dose Escalation of Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Retrospective Analysis From an Indian University Teaching Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-World Outcomes With Low-Dose Dasatinib (50 mg) in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase: A Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy and Safety.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment in low- and middle-income countries faces significant financial and logistical constraints. In scenarios where second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are unavailable or unaffordable, dose escalation of imatinib provides an alternative. This study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes of dose escalation of imatinib in CML patients who experienced suboptimal response or progression on standard doses.
methodsA retrospective analysis of 123 CML patients treated at an Indian university teaching hospital from 2013 to 2016 was conducted. Patients who showed progression on a 400 mg dose of imatinib were escalated to 600 mg, and further to 800 mg if required. Demographic data, progression, and toxicity were analyzed.
resultsOut of 123 patients, 78 (63.4%) showed a complete hematologic response after dose escalation. The median PFS was 48 months, with a three-year PFS rate of 67%. Notable toxicities included Grade 3/4 neutropenia in 15% and gastrointestinal disturbances in 12%. Comparatively, studies suggest that switching to a second-line TKI in similar settings results in a higher PFS; however, our findings underscore that dose escalation of imatinib remains a viable alternative when financial constraints limit access to second-line therapies.
conclusionIn resource-constrained settings, dose escalation of imatinib can be an effective strategy for managing CML patients who progress on standard doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.