ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Transcriptome sequencing and Mendelian randomization analysis identified biomarkers related to neutrophil extracellular traps in diabetic retinopathy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps in diabetes mellitus and its complications: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications.iScience · 2026Review
- Combined proteomics and metabolomics analyses revealed molecular signatures associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Remodeling of the mitochondrial quality control network: natural products intervening in diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- EIF1 coordinates transcriptomic and splicing networks associated with cell cycle dysregulation in diabetic retinopathy.PloS one · 2026Article
- Transcriptomics of Various Diseases Reveals the Core Role of Immune System Pathways in Retinal Damage Repair and Nerve Regeneration.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Summary: In the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR), neutrophil infiltration hastens the adhesion between neutrophils and endothelial cells, leading to inflammation. Meanwhile, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) produced by neutrophils could clear aging blood vessels, setting the stage for retinal vascular regeneration. To explore the mechanism of NETs-related genes in DR, the transcriptome of NETs from normal and DR individuals were analyzed with gene sequencing and mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Five NETs-related genes were identified as key genes. Among these genes, CLIC3, GBP2, and P2RY12 were found to be risk factors for Proliferative DR(PDR), whereas HOXA1 and PSAP were protective factors. Further verification by qRT-PCR recognized GBP2, P2RY12 and PSAP as NETs-associated biomarkers in PDR. Purpose: To investigate neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) related genes as biomarkers in the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: We collected whole blood samples from 10 individuals with DR and 10 normal controls (NCs) for transcriptome sequencing. Following quality control and preprocessing of the sequencing data, differential expression analysis was conducted to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the DR and NC groups. Candidate genes were then selected by intersecting these DEGs with key module genes identified through weighted gene co-expression network analysis. These candidate genes were subjected to mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, then least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis to pinpoint key genes. The diagnostic utility of these key genes was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and their expression levels were examined. Additional analysis, including nomogram construction, gene set enrichment analysis, drug prediction and molecular docking, were performed to investigate the functions and molecular mechanisms of the key genes. Finally, the expression of key genes was verified by qRT-PCR and biomarkers were identified. Results: Intersection of 1,004 DEGs with 1,038 key module genes yielded 291 candidate genes. Five key genes were identified: HOXA1, GBP2, P2RY12, CLIC3 and PSAP. Among them, CLIC3, GBP2, and P2RY12 were identified as risk factors for DR, while HOXA1 and PSAP were protective. These key genes demonstrated strong diagnostic performance for DR. With the exception of P2RY12, all other key genes exhibited down-regulation in the DR group. Furthermore, the nomogram incorporating multiple key genes demonstrated superior predictive capacity for DR compared to a single key genes. The identified key genes are involved in oxidative phosphorylation and ribosome functions. Drug predictions targeting P2RY12 suggested prasugrel, ticagrelor, and ticlopidine as potential options owing to their high binding affinity with this key genes. The qRT-PCR results revealed that the results of GBP2, PSAP and P2RY12 exhibited consistent expression patterns with the dataset. Conclusion: This study identified GBP2, P2RY12 and PSAP as NETs-associated biomarkers in the development of PDR, offering new insights for clinical diagnosis and potential treatment strategies for DR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.