Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483446›Full record

ReviewGlobal health & medicine2024

Advances in HIV management and challenges in Japan: Current situation of pre-exposure prophylaxis in Tokyo.

Daisuke Mizushima, Hiroyuki Gatanaga, Shinichi Oka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global health & medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daisuke MizushimaAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki GatanagaAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinichi OkaAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the world's first case series of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection were reported, more than 40 decades have passed. The advancement of HIV treatment and prevention has progressed drastically. Especially, the efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention has been proven by a number of trials and the number of new HIV cases has declined over the years due to the large-scale and rapid implementation of PrEP and universal HIV treatment in multiple countries. However, in Japan, PrEP is not approved or officially supported as of June 2024. Despite of the absence of top-down movement, men who have sex with men (MSM)-friendly private clinics initiated prescriptions of generic medicines for oral PrEP with necessary tests in Tokyo, which greatly contributed to improve access to PrEP. It is of note that current situation of bottom-up PrEP implementation using generic medicines in Tokyo is obviously cost-saving, which is needless to evaluate. However, expense of PrEP is fully out-of-pocket, which will hinder those with low or no income from accessing PrEP services despite the low prices of generic medicines. Furthermore, current PrEP implementation based on user-friendly clinics is functioning only in Tokyo. The role of public health authorities is important to solve these financial and geographical disparities in accessing PrEP services, without impairing existing virtues of accessibility and cost-saving in the current system.

Indexed as

antiretroviral therapyHIVpreexposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID39483446
PMCPMC11514633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.