Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483437›Full record

ReviewNeuroSci2022

How Do We Connect Brain Areas with Cognitive Functions? The Past, the Present and the Future.

Khushboo Verma, Satwant Kumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroSci, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khushboo VermaDepartment of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-6887
Satwant KumarCenter for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9054-2123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the central goals of cognitive neuroscience is to understand how structure relates to function. Over the past century, clinical studies on patients with lesions have provided key insights into the relationship between brain areas and behavior. Since the early efforts for characterization of cognitive functions focused on localization, we provide an account of cognitive function in terms of localization. Next, using body perception as an example, we summarize the contemporary techniques. Finally, we outline the trajectory of current progress into the future and discuss the implications for clinical and basic neuroscience.

Indexed as

body perceptioncognitioncognitive functionselectrical microsimulationextrastriate body areafunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)fusiform body arealesion studieslocalizationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39483437
PMCPMC11523709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.