Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483402›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Stronger together: perspectives on gratitude social processes in group interventions for adolescents.

Y Joel Wong, Alexis L Pandelios, Kane Carlock, Alexandria M B Thielmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Y Joel WongDepartment of Applied Psychology in Education and Research Methodology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Alexis L PandeliosDepartment of Applied Psychology in Education and Research Methodology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Kane Carlock *Department of Applied Psychology in Education and Research Methodology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Alexandria M B Thielmeyer *Department of Applied Psychology in Education and Research Methodology, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most gratitude interventions for adolescents focus on private experiences of gratitude (e.g., gratitude journaling), dyadic expressions of gratitude (e.g., writing a gratitude letter to another person), or group-based psychoeducation about gratitude. By contrast, group interventions that emphasize gratitude social processes (GSPs)-interpersonal or group processes that involve or are directly triggered by the disclosure or expression of gratitude to other group members-provide an ideal forum for adolescents to reap the full benefits of gratitude experiences. In this perspective article, we propose a typology of five GSPs-disclosing, expressing, receiving, responding to, and witnessing gratitude in relation to other group members-that operate synergistically to produce positive effects for adolescents. In turn, we theorize that these GSPs likely produce superior outcomes, as compared to other gratitude interventions, through five psychosocial mechanisms of change: observational learning, group cohesion, vicarious gratitude, group-based gratitude, and collective gratitude. Overall, we encourage researchers and practitioners to incorporate GSPs in their gratitude interventions with adolescents.

Indexed as

adolescentsgratitudegroupinterventionssocial

Identifiers

PMID39483402
PMCPMC11526286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.