Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Introducing Open Dialogue as part of the WHO QualityRights Project in South Korea: experiences and opinions from an introductory workshop and 1-year pilot practice.

Sooni Cho, Yong Hyuk Cho, Jai Sung Noh, Seong Kwon Jeong, Shin Kwon Kim, Seongsu Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sooni Cho *Eum Hospital, Yong In, Republic of Korea.
Yong Hyuk Cho *Department of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jai Sung NohDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Seong Kwon JeongEum Hospital, Yong In, Republic of Korea.
Shin Kwon KimDepartment of Medical Humanities and Social Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Seongsu KimDawon Mental Health Clinic, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the subjective experiences of participants in a 5-day Open Dialogue (OD) workshop and a 1-year pilot practice, conducted as part of the WHO QualityRights Project in South Korea. Twenty-four participants, selected through purposive sampling, completed surveys immediately after the workshop and 1 year later. Data were analyzed through both statistical and thematic approaches. A statistically significant decrease in the availability of "Flexibility and Mobility" was observed across all participants (

Indexed as

human rightsimplementation of Open DialogueOpen DialogueOpen Dialogue trainingperson-centeredrecovery practiceWHO QualityRights

Identifiers

PMID39483400
PMCPMC11525595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.