ArticleRSC advances2024
Enhancement of antibacterial activity in electrospun fibrous membranes based on quaternized chitosan with caffeic acid and berberine chloride for wound dressing applications.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Janus electrospun nanofiber membranes from bio-based furan polyamides for antibacterial wound care.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Recent Advances and Future Perspectives on Chitosan-Sago-Derived Sodium Starch Glycolate as a Biopolymeric Carrier for Alpha-Mangostin Nanoparticles in Wound Healing.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Caffeic Acid and Erythromycin: Antibacterial and Synergistic Effects on Staphylococci.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Chitosan-Based Dressing Materials for Burn Wound Healing.Polymers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrospun nanofibers made from chitosan are promising materials for surgical wound dressings due to their non-toxicity and biocompatibility. However, the antibacterial activity of chitosan is limited by its poor water solubility under physiological conditions. This study addresses this issue by producing electrospun nanofibers mainly from natural compounds, including chitosan and quaternized chitosan, which enhance both its solubility for electrospinning and the antibacterial activity of the resulting electrospun nanofibers. Additionally, antimicrobial agents like caffeic acid or berberine chloride were incorporated. The glutaraldehyde-treated nanofibers showed improved mechanical properties, with an average tensile strength exceeding 2.7 MPa, comparable to other chitosan-based wound dressings. They also demonstrated enhanced water stability, retaining over 50% of their original weight after one week in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 37 °C. The morphology and performance of these nanofibers were thoroughly examined and discussed. Furthermore, these membranes displayed rapid drug release, indicating potential for inhibiting bacterial growth. Antibacterial assays revealed that S2-CX nanofibers containing caffeic acid were most effective against
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.