Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483370›Full record

ArticleNeuroSci2022

Rethinking the Methods and Algorithms for Inner Speech Decoding and Making Them Reproducible.

Foteini Simistira Liwicki, Vibha Gupta, Rajkumar Saini, Kanjar De, Marcus Liwicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroSci, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Decoding imagined speech with delay differential analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Featured Papers inNeuroSci · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Foteini Simistira LiwickiEmbedded Intelligent Systems LAB, Machine Learning, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden; vibha.gupta@ltu.se (V.G.); rajkumar.saini@ltu.se (R.S.); kanjar.de@ltu.se (K.D.); marcus.liwicki@ltu.se (M.L.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6756-0147
Vibha GuptaEmbedded Intelligent Systems LAB, Machine Learning, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden; vibha.gupta@ltu.se (V.G.); rajkumar.saini@ltu.se (R.S.); kanjar.de@ltu.se (K.D.); marcus.liwicki@ltu.se (M.L.).
Rajkumar SainiEmbedded Intelligent Systems LAB, Machine Learning, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden; vibha.gupta@ltu.se (V.G.); rajkumar.saini@ltu.se (R.S.); kanjar.de@ltu.se (K.D.); marcus.liwicki@ltu.se (M.L.).
Kanjar DeEmbedded Intelligent Systems LAB, Machine Learning, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden; vibha.gupta@ltu.se (V.G.); rajkumar.saini@ltu.se (R.S.); kanjar.de@ltu.se (K.D.); marcus.liwicki@ltu.se (M.L.).
Marcus LiwickiEmbedded Intelligent Systems LAB, Machine Learning, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187 Luleå, Sweden; vibha.gupta@ltu.se (V.G.); rajkumar.saini@ltu.se (R.S.); kanjar.de@ltu.se (K.D.); marcus.liwicki@ltu.se (M.L.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4029-6574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on the automatic decoding of inner speech using noninvasive methods, such as Electroencephalography (EEG). While inner speech has been a research topic in philosophy and psychology for half a century, recent attempts have been made to decode nonvoiced spoken words by using various brain-computer interfaces. The main shortcomings of existing work are reproducibility and the availability of data and code. In this work, we investigate various methods (using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTM)) for the detection task of five vowels and six words on a publicly available EEG dataset. The main contributions of this work are (1) subject dependent vs. subject-independent approaches, (2) the effect of different preprocessing steps (Independent Component Analysis (ICA), down-sampling and filtering), and (3) word classification (where we achieve state-of-the-art performance on a publicly available dataset). Overall we achieve a performance accuracy of 35.20% and 29.21% when classifying five vowels and six words, respectively, in a publicly available dataset, using our tuned iSpeech-CNN architecture. All of our code and processed data are publicly available to ensure reproducibility. As such, this work contributes to a deeper understanding and reproducibility of experiments in the area of inner speech detection.

Indexed as

brain–computer interface (BCI)Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)deep learningelectroencephalography (EEG)independent component analysisinner speechsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39483370
PMCPMC11523721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.