Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39483353›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

Natural Language Processing Methods for the Study of Protein-Ligand Interactions.

James Michels, Ramya Bandarupalli, Amin Ahangar Akbari, Thai Le, Hong Xiao, Jing Li, Erik F Y Hom

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James MichelsDepartment of Computer Science, University of Mississippi, University, MS.
Ramya BandarupalliDepartment of BioMolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS.
Amin Ahangar AkbariDepartment of BioMolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS.
Thai LeDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Hong XiaoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Mississippi, University, MS.
Jing LiDepartment of BioMolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS.
Erik F Y HomDepartment of Biology and Center for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, University of Mississippi, University, MS.

Funding

Tracking Glycosylation State with Fluorinated Glycosides ProbesP20GM130460 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI Joshua S Sharp · 2020 to 2026
$17.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) has revolutionized the way computers are used to study and interact with human languages and is increasingly influential in the study of protein and ligand binding, which is critical for drug discovery and development. This review examines how NLP techniques have been adapted to decode the "language" of proteins and small molecule ligands to predict protein-ligand interactions (PLIs). We discuss how methods such as long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, transformers, and attention mechanisms can leverage different protein and ligand data types to identify potential interaction patterns. Significant challenges are highlighted, including the scarcity of high-quality negative data, difficulties in interpreting model decisions, and sampling biases of existing datasets. We argue that focusing on improving data quality, enhancing model robustness, and fostering both collaboration and competition could catalyze future advances in machine-learning-based predictions of PLIs.

Identifiers

PMID39483353
PMCPMC11527106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.